· 12/15/2006
Banks v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms
Citations
- 471 F.3d 1341
- 374 U.S. App. D.C. 93
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 30823
- 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,667
- 99 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 801
- 2006 WL 3687761
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant “never pressed its objections and assured its opponent that it would produce a privilege log”
- “So reluctant are we to consider [advisory] mandamus relief that even where we have been presented really extraordinary cases, we are careful to caution against indiscriminate mandamus review.” (quotation marks omitted)
- “We do not grant mandamus relief for the same reason: the appellant has an adequate remedy at law and may appeal the contested decision following a final judgment.”
- “So reluctant are we to consider [advisory] mandamus relief that even where we have been presented really extraordinary cases, we are careful to caution against indiscriminate mandamus review.” (quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Randolph, Griffith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.