Banks v. INTERNATIONAL RENTAL AND LEASING CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the district court did not err in holding husband’s loss of consortium claim was derivative to wife's claim for injury
• concluding the district court did not err in holding husband’s loss of consortium claim was derivative to wife’s claim for injury
• noting that a loss of consortium claim “must rise or fall” with the underlying tort claim
• “[I]n a commendably thorough and very well reasoned opinion, the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands explained . . . that the Legislature did not intend for section 4 of title 1 to compel this Court to mechanically apply the most recent Restatement.”
• “[I]n a commendably thorough and very well reasoned opinion, the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands explained . . . that the Legislature did not intend for section 4 of title 1 to compel this Court to mechanically apply the most recent Restatement. ...”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).