Skip to main content

Banks v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 434 S.E.2d 681
  • 16 Va. App. 959
  • 10 Va. Law Rep. 163
  • 1993 Va. App. LEXIS 388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence that the Commonwealth's witness distributed drugs while investigating the defendant for drug-related activity was admissible to show that the witness had a motive to falsely implicate the defendant in order to conceal his own crimes
  • upholding admission of “[e]vidence of specific acts of misconduct to show bias or motive to fabricate,” even though inadmissible if offered merely for impeachment
  • “If believed, the trier of fact could reasonably infer from the defendant’s proffered evidence that Barnwell had a strong motive to implicate the defendant in order to conceal his own alleged drug-dealing activities.”
  • relevant evidence that is not collateral should be admitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.