Banks v. City of Rockford

Oral argument

• Argued

  47 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence seized pursuant to a warrant based on materially false and misleading information is inadmissible at trial
• holding that, in limited circumstances, accused is entitled to evidentiary hearing on veracity of search warrant affidavit
• holding that the burden is on the defendant when the validity of the warrant is challenged
• holding that the Fourth Amendment entitles a defendant to a hearing if he establishes a prima facie case that a search warrant affidavit included knowingly or recklessly false statements
• holding that where a defendant shows that a search warrant affidavit includes false statements necessary to the finding of probable cause, the search warrant is void
• holding that, under certain limited circumstances, a defendant is entitled under the Fourth Amendment to attack collaterally the veracity of a warrant affidavit in the context of challenging the existence of probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).