Skip to main content
· 5/6/1988

Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,307 in Re Robert O. Lister, Jr., and Marie Lister, Debtors. John T. Haskins v. United States

Citations

  • 846 F.2d 55
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6065
  • 1988 WL 41934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the test is “whether the efforts of the applicant resulted in an actual and demonstrable benefit to the debtor’s estate and the creditors.”
  • stating that the test is \whether the efforts of the applicant resulted in an actual and demonstrable benefit to the debtor's estate and the creditors.\
  • stating that the test is “whether the efforts of the applicant resulted in an actual and demonstrable benefit to the debtor’s estate and the creditors.”
  • opining, as support for the Court’s denial of a section 503(b)(3)(D) claim, that the applicant’s pre-petition efforts were undertaken solely for the purpose of collecting a judgment
  • denying reimbursement for the applicant’s pre-petition efforts to collect a judgment when he “was unaware of the pen-dency of bankruptcy proceedings!,]” and thus, were solely for his own interest
  • denying compensation to creditor whose efforts were undertaken solely to foster own self-interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKay, Alarcon, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.