Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “a judicial determination” of adequate protection “is a question of fact rooted in measurements of value and the credibility of witnesses” and therefore subject to the clearly erroneous standard
• concluding that “a judicial determination” of adequate protection “is a question of fact rooted in measurements of value and the credibility of witnesses” and therefore subject to the clearly erroneous standard
• concluding “that a judicial determination of such adequate protection is a question of fact rooted in measurements of value and the credibility of witnesses.”
• economic projections by the trustee as well as by independent consultants may be accepted as sufficient
• loan of $1.5 to $2 million would result in prevention of loss of fifty (50%) percent to ninety (90%) percent of business worth in excess of $19 million; loan approved
• predictions of any variety are never totally reliable but when they are made by a professional operating within his area of competence and supported by data, such predictions are worthy of some deference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).