Bankert v. Bernstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving removal proceedings based on a 1998 conviction for delivery of heroin that the government contended was an aggravated felony
• “[M]ere solicitation . . . does not constitute ‘attempt[].” (citing United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 247 F.3d 905, 908- 09 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc))
• an aggravated felony “may not be accomplished by merely . . . offering delivery” of a controlled substance
• “The previously published version of this opinion [Sandoval I] also considered whether [Oregon Revised Statutes] § 475.992(1)(a) was an ‘illicit trafficking’ offense . . . . Because the BIA did not consider this issue, we decline to do so here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).