Bankers & Shippers Insurance v. Electro Enterprises Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an insurer was hable to the insured for the costs of defending underlying personal injury suits where the insurer had a duty to defend the insured
• allowing the prevailing party in a declaratory judgment action to bring a separate action for further relief
• allowing the prevailing party in a declaratory judgment action to bring a separate action for further relief
• addressing a declaratory judgment ruling on policy coverage disputes brought soon after the underlying tort claim was filed
• explaining, in defense coverage dispute, that “a party [may] bring one action requesting only a declaratory judgment and then [] bring a separate action for further relief based on the rights determined by that judgment”
• interpreting provision similar to NRS 30.100 as \expressly permit [ting] a party to bring one action requesting only a declaratory judgment and then to bring a separate action for further relief based on the rights determined by that judgment\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).