Bankers' Reserve Life Co. v. Yelland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• motion for judgment of acquittal must state specific theory on which state’s proof was insufficient
• “A motion for judgment of acquittal does not automatically encompass a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. The motion must state the specific theory on which the state’s proof was insufficient.”
• when challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, a defendant must state the “specific theory on which the state’s proof was insufficient” in order to preserve it for appeal
• “A motion for judgment of acquittal does not automatically encompass a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. The motion must state the specific theory on which the state’s proof was insufficient.”
• “A motion for judgment of acquittal does not automatically encompass a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. The motion must state the specific theory on which the state’s proof was insufficient.”
• \A motion for judgment of acquittal does not automatically encompass a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. The motion must state the specific theory on which the state's proof was insufficient.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).