Bankers Multiple Line Ins. Co. v. Farish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]ny intentional conduct attributed to a corporation must be committed by an officer, agent, or employee of the corporation”
• holding that “when a principal’s liability rests solely on the doctrine of respondeat superior, a principal cannot be held liable if the agent is exonerated”
• addressing corporation’s responsibility for punitive damages in the context of president of the corporation’s tortious interference with an employee’s contract with the employee’s attorneys
• under Florida and federal due process laws, a punitive award must be proportionate to the \actual harm inflicted on the plaintiff\
• “The fact that a statement of reasoning may be set forth in a judicial opinion does not mean that it is a proper jury instruction.”
• \The fact that a statement of reasoning may be set forth in a judicial opinion does not mean that it is a proper jury instruction.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).