Bank One v. Anioma Home Health Care Agencies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “the removal of a right to a direct appeal [of a juvenile transfer order] is also a substantive change in the law” that applies only prospectively and not retroactively to cases predating statutory amendment
• statute eliminating the right of a juvenile to take interlocutory appeal from a transfer order affects a juvenile’s substantive interests and therefore may not be applied retroactively
• to determine whether change in law is retro- active as applied to specific crime, court looks to date of crime
• statutory amendment removing right to direct appeal from juvenile transfer order is substantive
• construing mandatory juvenile transfer statute
• construing mandatory juvenile transfer statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).