Skip to main content
· 8/18/1992

Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Taylor

Citations

  • 970 F.2d 16
  • 20 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 732
  • 23 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 870
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19041
  • 1992 WL 197363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • conditions in a note defining event of default are rendered meaningless if the agreement was intended to be payable on demand
  • “As an appellate court, we ... will overturn a district court’s denial of a motion for new trial only if there is an ‘absolute absence of evidence to support the jury’s verdict.’ ” (quoting Seidman v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134, 1140 (5th Cir. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Garza, Mahon, Reynaldo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.