Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there was no evidence party made representations with intent not to perform on note when party subsequently made payment for five years
• noting that, under Texas law, the nature of the relationship between the parties governs whether there is an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing
• holding there was no evidence party made representations with intent not to perform on note when party subsequently made payment for five years
• refusing to imply that a bank has a duty to cooperate with its client when the parties specifically contracted the extent of their bailment relationship
• “Although the allegations are broad, both petitions raise a reasonable inference that Bank One and Weyerhaeuser participated in a conspiracy to defraud LRI by inducing Trendmaker to avoid liability on the Midland Note.”
• “Secured Party’s Right 4 to Take Possession After Default”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).