Skip to main content
· 4/5/2002

Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd

Citations

  • 288 F.3d 181
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6226
  • 2002 WL 518633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the district court abused its discretion in part because the reliance on the state court’s relative progress to the federal court’s progress to weigh in favor of abstention was misattributed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Higginbotham, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.