Bank One, Louisiana v. Viso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exclusion was void as against public policy because the coverage required by the uninsured motorist statute is \person oriented\ rather than \vehicle oriented\
• purpose of the underinsured coverage is to protect named insured and other additional insureds from inadequate compensation caused by an accident with an inadequately insured automobile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).