Skip to main content
· 10/25/1996

Bank One Columbus, N.A. v. Fulginiti (In Re Fulginiti)

Citations

  • 201 B.R. 730
  • 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1328
  • 29 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1180
  • 1996 WL 623007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the use of a cash advance to buy replacement windows and to pay other bills was not an attempt to \load up” debts but was more aptly described as \a straw that overloaded and, figuratively speaking, broke the Debtor’s back”
  • Judge Hill decision book entry number 291

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David A. Scholl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.