Bank of Santa Fe v. Marcy Plaza Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in holding that requisites necessary to prove res judicata were not present in case, the court assumed but did not decide that res judicata, like collateral estoppel, applies to prior arbitration awards, barring subsequent litigation
• “[The facts] are interrelated only because they both fall under the general category of a dispute concerning rental payments under the lease, but the claims involve different calculations and arose at different times ... ”
• “It would be unreasonable for the Bank to assume that, having addressed the narrow issue of whether finance expenses are deductible in determining ‘net profit,’ it would never have to arbitrate any dispute concerning rental payments ever again.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).