Bank of New Orleans v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[b]ecause [the] [d]efendants’ statute of limitations argument requires an evaluation on the merits of [the] [p]laintiff’s claim, it is inappropriate for resolution at this early stage of litigation.”
• explaining that “[b]ecause [the] [d]efendants’ statute of limitations argument requires an evaluation on the merits of [the] [p]laintiff’s claim, it is inappropriate for resolution at this early stage of litigation.”
• rejecting defendants’ argument that plaintiff’s “mere allegation that MAC acted ‘willfully,’ with no factual basis, is insufficient to warrant application of the three-year statute of limitations” at the conditional certification stage
• “Because Defendants' statute of limitations argument requires an evaluation of the merits of Plaintiff's [FLSA] claims, it is inappropriate for resolution at this early stage of litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).