· 9/6/1996
Bank of Matteson v. Brown
Citations
- 669 N.E.2d 1351
- 283 Ill. App. 3d 599
- 218 Ill. Dec. 825
- 1996 Ill. App. LEXIS 668
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘[t]he absence of a Rule 304 finding in a judgment — for whatever reason — leaves the judgment final but unenforceable and unappealable’ ”
- “It is well established that a judgment or order entered by a court that lacks the inherent power to enter the particular order is void ***.”
- “ ‘[t]he absence of a Rule 304 finding in a judgment–for whatever reason–leaves the judgment final but unenforceable and unappealable’ ”
- where a citation respondent argued that the underlying judgment was unenforceable absent a special Rule 304(a) finding because that judgment was against fewer than all the defendants, the reviewing court agreed that the underlying judgment was neither appealable nor enforceable
- final but unenforceable judgment cannot support supplementary proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McNAMARA
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.