Skip to main content
· 9/6/1996

Bank of Matteson v. Brown

Citations

  • 669 N.E.2d 1351
  • 283 Ill. App. 3d 599
  • 218 Ill. Dec. 825
  • 1996 Ill. App. LEXIS 668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ ‘[t]he absence of a Rule 304 finding in a judgment — for whatever reason — leaves the judgment final but unenforceable and unappealable’ ”
  • “It is well established that a judgment or order entered by a court that lacks the inherent power to enter the particular order is void ***.”
  • “ ‘[t]he absence of a Rule 304 finding in a judgment–for whatever reason–leaves the judgment final but unenforceable and unappealable’ ”
  • where a citation respondent argued that the underlying judgment was unenforceable absent a special Rule 304(a) finding because that judgment was against fewer than all the defendants, the reviewing court agreed that the underlying judgment was neither appealable nor enforceable
  • final but unenforceable judgment cannot support supplementary proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNAMARA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.