Bank of Hawai'i v. Snyder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that new and material evidence had been submitted and remanding claim to Board for VA to fulfill duty to assist and Board to adjudicate merits
• codifying § 3.105(a) in 38 U.S.C. § 5109A and superseding the ruling in Smith (William) v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1526 (Fed.Cir.1994
• providing an example of an inherently false or untrue statement, namely, “a male veteran’s testimony that his alleged service-connected disabilities are the result of complications associated with having just given birth”
• \Justus does not require the Secretary [of VA] to consider the patently incredible to be credible\
• \Justus does not require the Secretary [of VA] to consider the patently incredible to be credible\
• Justus credibility rule does not apply to newly submitted evidence which is inherently false or untrue; “Justis does not require the Secretary to consider the patently incredible to be credible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).