Bank of Commerce v. Medlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]ince the defendant did not specifically argue that the complained-of testimony and documentary evidence deprived him of his right to confrontation, that argument is unpreserved for appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).