Skip to main content
· 5/15/1979

Bank of California v. Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 286 Or. 427
  • 594 P.2d 1244
  • 1979 Ore. LEXIS 752

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding Arizona's restrictions on nonresident hunting substantially affected and discriminated against interstate commerce and remanding for the district to decide whether the restrictions had the requisite justification
  • “To determine whether the dormant Commerce Clause is applicable, we ask ... whether the activity regulated ... has a ‘substantial effect’ on interstate commerce such that Congress could regulate the activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke, Holman, Howell, Lent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.