· 12/27/1973
Bank of California v. Connolly
Citations
- 36 Cal. App. 3d 350
- 111 Cal. Rptr. 468
- 1973 Cal. App. LEXIS 1253
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing common-law distinctions between legal and equitable assignments and operative consideration requirements
- “Statutory provisions governing the rights of partners upon dissolution of a partnership are applicable to joint venturers” (citation omitted)
- “Whether a partnership ... exists is primarily a factual question to be determined by the trier of fact from the evidence and inferences to be drawn therefrom”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tamura
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.