Skip to main content
· 12/27/1973

Bank of California v. Connolly

Citations

  • 36 Cal. App. 3d 350
  • 111 Cal. Rptr. 468
  • 1973 Cal. App. LEXIS 1253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing common-law distinctions between legal and equitable assignments and operative consideration requirements
  • “Statutory provisions governing the rights of partners upon dissolution of a partnership are applicable to joint venturers” (citation omitted)
  • “Whether a partnership ... exists is primarily a factual question to be determined by the trier of fact from the evidence and inferences to be drawn therefrom”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamura

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.