Skip to main content
· 11/30/1998

Bank of Boston v. Burr (In Re Burr)

Citations

  • 160 F.3d 843
  • 1998 WL 804591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the retain-and-keep-current option is not capable of being performed within forty-five days of the filing of the statement of intention
  • “While the point might be obvious, the phrase ‘if applicable’ makes completely explicit that, in the event of a surrender of collateral, exemption, reaffirmation, and redemption will have no application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stahl, Lipez, Reavley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.