Bank of America v. Fortier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the D.C. Circuit treats § 501’s statutory requirements, like administrative exhaustion, as jurisdictional while regulatory requirements, like time-limits for appeal, as non-jurisdictional
• treating a claim in a complaint that a plaintiff “filed [with the EEOC], and then withdrew” as unexhausted
• dismissing for failure to exhaust when there was “no evidence” that plaintiff ever raised certain allegations in an administrative EEO complaint
• discussing the distinction between jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional exhaustion under the Rehabilitation Act
• “claims against a federal agency—such as [ ] Rehabilitation Act claims . . . —must initially be brought before the employing agency itself.”
• “Doak made clear that Spinelli [v. Goss, 446 F.3d 159 (D.C. Cir. 2006

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).