Bank of Am., N.A. v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, where defendant was requesting a report for claims processing purposes, the defendant was not requesting an investigative consumer report under FCRA
• finding no FCRA violation when there was no indication \that [defendant] desired a report on [plaintiff] for a purpose encompassed within the statutory definition of an investigative consumer report\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).