Skip to main content
· 7/7/1911

Banister v. Fallis

Citations

  • 85 Kan. 320
  • 116 P. 822
  • 1911 Kan. LEXIS 66

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Unacknowledged Instrument — Record of No Cloud Upon Title — Incompetent Evidence of Title. The record of an unacknowledged contract on the part of a stranger to the record title to procure a reconveyance of a tract of land to one who has parted with his title does not constitute notice of the contract to a subsequent grantee of the land, does not constitute a cloud on the title of such grantee, and is not admissible in evidence against such grantee on the question of the validity of his title.</p> <p>2. Statute of Frauds — Oral Agreement Materially Changing Written, Contract. An oral agreement between a vendor and a vendee of land which arrests consummation of the written contract between them until the vendor procures a deed to cure a supposed defect in his title, which deed the vendor promised to obtain, is unenforceable under the statute of frauds. ■</p>

Judges: Burch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.