Banister v. Burton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that brief and unrepeated improper statements at closing are unlikely to rise to the level of reversible error
• holding that brief and unrepeated im‐ proper statements at closing are unlikely to rise to the level of reversible error
• holding that emergency-room surgeon who treated shooting victim was adequately qualified to testify about victim’s ability to throw or crawl at the- time of treatment, despite not being a biomechan-ics expert or an orthopedic surgeon
• holding that emergency‐room surgeon who treated shooting victim was adequately qualified to testify about victim’s ability to throw or crawl at the time of treatment, despite not being a biome‐ chanics expert or an orthopedic surgeon
• trauma doctor was qualified to opine as to defendant’s ability to throw a gun or crawl after he was shot based on his knowledge of anatomy, despite a lack of specialized expertise in biomechanics or orthopedics
• “even if a report was necessary under [Rule 26(a)(2)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).