Bangs v. Pioneer Janitorial of Ames, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• answers to special verdict were inconsistent with each other (damage itemization 3 awarded $100,000 for past and future pain and suffering but $0 for medical expenses
• “If a verdict is internally inconsistent ... and there is no way to determine the jury’s intent, the proper remedy is a new trial.”
• “If a verdict is internally inconsistent ..., and there is no way to determine the jury’s intent, the proper remedy is a new trial.” (citing Cowan, 461 N.W.2d at 160; Hoffman v. Nat'l Med. Enters., Inc., 442 N.W.2d 123, 127 (Iowa 1989))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).