Bangs v. Maxwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 30-day stay not required where Court found in favor of pro se appellant and Secretary had full opportunity to file briefs on issue in question
• applying Linville and Rule 305(a) as basis for holding NOA timely filed with Court where it was received more than 120 days after mailing of BVA decision but where intervening mailing of motion for reconsideration to BVA had been postmarked on the 120th day after BVA decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).