Bangoura v. United States Department of Army

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s response to plaintiffs FOIA request “without more, does not present a ‘cognizable danger of recurrent violation’ or ‘an illegal agency policy’ ” sufficient to justify declaratory judgment
• finding that names and \identities\ of government personnel were \properly withheld\ under Exemption 6
• “‘FOIA does not create a cause of action for an agency’s untimely response to a FOIA request’ beyond the ability to seek an injunction from the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).