Bangor & Piscataquis Rail Road v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the failure to follow the procedural requirements of [T.C.A. §] 27-8-106 for petitions for writ of certiorari in civil cases did not deprive the Court of Criminal Appeals of jurisdiction to hear these appeals”
• holding that “the failure to follow the procedural requirements of [Tenn. Code Ann. §] 27- 8-106 for petitions for writ of certiorari in civil cases did not deprive the Court of Criminal Appeals of jurisdiction to hear these appeals”
• noting that the statutory codification of the common law writ of certiorari recognizes that the writ may lie where “already authorized by law” prior to the statute’s enactment and in certain additional instances provided by the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).