Skip to main content
· 7/30/1999

Bangor Hydro-Electric Co. v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Citations

  • 62 F. Supp. 2d 152
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11803
  • 1999 WL 614579

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, under Maine law, ambiguity of contract language is a question of law that turns on whether the language is “reasonably susceptible of different interpretations”
  • “Where the existence of an arbitration agreement is at issue, that question is to be decided with reference to state contract law principles.”
  • “[T]his policy [favoring arbitration] applies only to the interpretation of the scope of an arbitration agreement, rather than to the question of whether such an agreement exists in the first place.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.