Bane v. Virginia Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss inmate’s Rehabilitation Act claim that prison guards handcuffed plaintiff’s arms behind his back despite medical order prohibiting such cuffing
• finding fact issues remained on inmate’s deliberate indifference claim that prison official defendant ordered inmate to be handcuffed from behind despite medical waiver requiring that inmate be cuffed in front
• upholding constitutionality of the Rehabilitation Act under the Spending Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).