Bane v. Pearson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “where, as here, the government has not timely presented a harmless-error argument, we are reluctant to raise and resolve the issue sua sponte ”
• ALJ properly discounted claimant’s credibility based on her 8 own admissions and inconsistency between her testimony and descriptions of her 9 activities and abilities
• “A defendant’s views about the validity of the relevant statutes . . . are ‘irrelevant to the issue of willfulness.’” (quoting Cheek, 489 U.S. at 206)
• “[A]ppellants challenge the district court’s finding at sentencing that they are responsible for an intended loss of $42.7 million ... that corresponds to a 22-lev-el increase in their total offense level.... [Their] arguments are meritless.”
• applying waiver in this context
• applying waiver in this context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).