Bandi v. Claudy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is an abuse of discretion to grant a motion for protective order where the “recitation of expense and burdensomeness are merely conclusory”
• explaining that a stay is proper if the resolution of a pending dispositive motion might dispose of the case and improper if discovery is necessary to respond to motion
• finding conclusory recitations of expense and burdensomeness are not sufficiently specific to demonstrate why requested discovery is objectionable
• conclusory recitations of expense and burdensomeness are not sufficiently 28 specific to demonstrate why discovery is objectionable
• “[A] magistrate has broad discretion to stay discovery until the district court rules on a pending dispositive motion”
• “[A] magistrate [judge] has broad discretion to stay discovery pending decision on a dispositive motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).