· 11/18/2009

Bandak v. ELI LILLY AND CO. RETIREMENT PLAN

Citations

587 F.3d 798
48 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1001
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25369
2009 WL 3837314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“The pre- sumption in interpreting a contract is that the meaning of a technical term is its technical meaning, and thus, if it is a tech- nical legal term, its technical legal meaning.”
“The pre- sumption in interpreting a contract is that the meaning of a technical term is its technical meaning, and thus, if it is a tech- nical legal term, its technical legal meaning.”
“The pre- sumption in interpreting a contract is that the meaning of a technical term is its technical meaning, and thus, if it is a tech- nical legal term, its technical legal meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Rovner, and Williams, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.