Skip to main content
· 9/27/1991

Banco Do Brasil, S.A. v. Latian, Inc.

Citations

  • 234 Cal. App. 3d 973
  • 285 Cal. Rptr. 870
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7901
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 12040
  • 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether a contract is reasonably susceptible of a meaning advanced by parole evidence is a question of law reviewed de novo
  • whether a contract is reasonably susceptible of a meaning advanced by parole evidence is a question of law reviewed de novo
  • “[I]t cannot reasonably be presumed that the parties intended to integrate two directly contradictory terms in the same agreement.”
  • an integration clause “may well be conclusive on the issue of integration”
  • an integration clause \may well be conclusive on the issue of integration\
  • “Testimony of intention which is contrary to a contract's expressed terms ... does not give meaning to the contract; rather it seeks to substitute a different meaning.... [S]uch evidence must be excluded.''

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Croskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.