Skip to main content
· 6/26/1987

Banco De Ponce v. Hinsdale Supermarket Corp.

Citations

  • 663 F. Supp. 813
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that no provision in the statute “ascribes to [vendors] specific rights”
  • finding no private right of action for vendor under WIC statute
  • \[F]ederal question jurisdiction exists if at least one of the threatened actions fairly alleged in the interpleader complaint arises under federal law.\
  • \[F]ederal question jurisdiction exists if at least one of the threatened actions fairly alleged in the interpleader complaint arises under federal law.\
  • “[F]ederal question jurisdiction exists if at least one of the threatened actions fairly alleged in the interpleader complaint arises under federal law.”
  • “[Fjederal question jurisdiction exists if at least one of the threatened actions fairly alleged in the interpleader complaint arises under federal law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nickerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.