Banc One Acceptance Corp. v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Plaintiff] does not challenge the ‘very existence’ of the contract. . . . Instead, [Plaintiff] asserts that the arbitration clause is ‘procedurally unconscionable[.]’”
• “where the ‘very existence of a contract’ containing the relevant arbitration agreement is called into question, the federal courts have authority and responsibility to decide the matter.”
• where the very existence of a contract containing an arbitration provision is at issue, federal courts have the authority and responsibility to decide the matter, and where no valid arbitration agreement exists, arbitrator is without authority to decide anything
• discussing Court’s reasoning in Prima Paint
• arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).