Bame v. Dillard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiffs “were placed in holding cells again, exclusively with one another. They were not commingled with the general inmate population.”
• emphasizing, in finding that the strip searches at issue were constitutional, that arrestees were not going to be placed in the general prison population
• emphasizing, in finding that the strip searches at issue were constitutional, that arrestees were -12- not going to be placed in the general prison population
• explaining Marshal Dillard’s practice of routinely performing “strip searches of all detained arrestees during the entire thirteen years he was Marshal”
• plaintiffs were “held together at all times and not commingled with the general inmate population”
• “Superior Court Marshals act under color of federal law, and thus do not qualify as state actors for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).