· 2/7/2011
Bamcor LLC v. Jupiter Aluminum Corp.
Citations
- 767 F. Supp. 2d 959
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12015
- 2011 WL 556391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Whether the Uniform Commercial Code or common law applies to resolve this dispute is determined by whether the transaction is primarily one for goods or services.” (citations omitted)
- “By performing after receiving Jupiter's purchase order, Bamcor accepted the terms of Jupiter's purchase order, which included a paragraph declaring void all inconsistent and additional terms Bamcor previously proposed.”
- “An expert may criticize the methods, calculations, and conclusions offered by the opposing side’s expert . . . [s]uch criticisms aid the trier of fact in determining how much weight to assign the expert’s opinion in deliberation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andrew P. Rodovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.