Skip to main content
· 2/7/2011

Bamcor LLC v. Jupiter Aluminum Corp.

Citations

  • 767 F. Supp. 2d 959
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12015
  • 2011 WL 556391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Whether the Uniform Commercial Code or common law applies to resolve this dispute is determined by whether the transaction is primarily one for goods or services.” (citations omitted)
  • “By performing after receiving Jupiter's purchase order, Bamcor accepted the terms of Jupiter's purchase order, which included a paragraph declaring void all inconsistent and additional terms Bamcor previously proposed.”
  • “An expert may criticize the methods, calculations, and conclusions offered by the opposing side’s expert . . . [s]uch criticisms aid the trier of fact in determining how much weight to assign the expert’s opinion in deliberation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andrew P. Rodovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.