Skip to main content
· 5/28/1996

Bamberger & Feibleman v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.

Citations

  • 665 N.E.2d 933
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 722
  • 1996 WL 288625

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that economic losses are not recoverable in a negligence action simply because the product failed to perform as expected absent injury to person or property
  • holding that economic losses are not recoverable in a negligence action simply because the product failed to perform as expected absent injury to person or property
  • holding that economic losses are not recoverable in a negligence action simply because the product failed to perform as expected absent injury to person or property
  • noting reluctance to extend economic loss rule to all negligence actions
  • noting reluctance to extend economic loss rule to all negligence actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Baker, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.