Bamber v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a vehicle is a non-owned covered auto when the employee uses it “in the course of his employment”
• an employee’s personal vehicle is a non-owned auto used “in connection with [insured’s] business” when used in the course and scope of employee’s employment with the insured
• “While the term ‘Any Auto’ is not defined in the policy, the meaning of the term, as it is used in the policy, logically refers to all autos falling within the subsequent limited categories . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).