· 12/17/1997
Balut v. Loral Electronic Systems
Citations
- 988 F. Supp. 339
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20131
- 1997 WL 780924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no interrelation where employees were transferred among subsidiaries annually, but not on a day-to-day basis
- “The fact that [the parent] Loral reviewed [the subsidiary’s] operations biannually, however, does not demonstrate an interrelationship, because a parent typically reviews a subsidiary’s progress on a periodic basis”
- “employees, if transferred, were transferred among subsidiaries ‘annually,’ and not on a day-to-day basis”
- even though senior employees “ultimately report to the parent’s officers . . . this exercise of control does not [necessarily] exceed the control normally exercised by a parent” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William C. Conner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.