Skip to main content
· 12/17/1997

Balut v. Loral Electronic Systems

Citations

  • 988 F. Supp. 339
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20131
  • 1997 WL 780924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no interrelation where employees were transferred among subsidiaries annually, but not on a day-to-day basis
  • “The fact that [the parent] Loral reviewed [the subsidiary’s] operations biannually, however, does not demonstrate an interrelationship, because a parent typically reviews a subsidiary’s progress on a periodic basis”
  • “employees, if transferred, were transferred among subsidiaries ‘annually,’ and not on a day-to-day basis”
  • even though senior employees “ultimately report to the parent’s officers . . . this exercise of control does not [necessarily] exceed the control normally exercised by a parent” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William C. Conner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.