Baltzell v. Ates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner “may not raise new issues and present new factual materials in a reply brief that it should have raised in its initial brief.”
• noting that a “moving party may not raise new issues and present new factual materials in a reply brief that it should have raised in its initial brief” and that “[t]his doctrine extends to the habeas context . . . .”
• declining to consider ineffective assistance of counsel claims as to two additional witnesses raised for the first time in a reply brief
• declining to consider ineffective assistance of counsel claims as to two additional witnesses raised for the first time in a reply brief
• declining to consider ineffective assistance of counsel claims as to two additional witnesses raised for the first time in a reply brief
• extending doctrine that a moving party may not raise new issues in a reply brief to petitions for habeas relief because “[b]asic fairness requires that an opposing party have a fair notice of his adversary’s claims, as well as an opportunity to address those claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).