Baltimore Sports & Social Club, Inc. v. Sport & Social, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a violation of zoning and construction ordinances is not enough to deny a tax exemption without legislative authorization
• concluding that N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6 imposes no requirement that “the property be [put to] a lawful use under the municipality’s zoning ordinance in order to qualify for tax exemption.”
• the “‘legislative design’ of the [s]tatute has been long-recognized as a ‘concession . . . [is] due as quid pro quo for the performance of a service essentially public, and which the State is hereby relieved . . . from the necessity of performing.’”
• the “legislative design of the [s]tatute has been long-recognized as a ’concession . . . [is] due as quid pro quo for the performance of a service essentially public, and which the State is hereby relieved . . . from the necessity of performing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).