Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that removal was proper because defendant who had not been served at time of removal was not “properly joined and served”
• noting that courts have found a party’s voter registration to be of particular importance in determining domicile
• explaining that domicile “requires physical presence, coupled with an intent to make the State a home.”
• Pennsylvania plaintiff suing Florida, Maryland, and West Virginia defendants
• “[A]lthough a literal application of § 1441(b)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).