Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This court has consistently held that documents which have not 26 had a proper foundation laid to authenticate them cannot support a motion for summary 27 judgment” (emphasis added); Hamilton v. Keystone Tankship Corp., 539 F.2d 684, 686 28 (9th Cir. 1976

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).