Skip to main content
· 6/7/1940

Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Joseph

Citations

  • 112 F.2d 518
  • 18 Ohio Op. 151
  • 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that combination of citation on plaintiffs car and summons sent by first class mail was sufficient to satisfy due process
  • holding that, although a parking citation failed to comply with state law, a deprivation of procedural due process did not occur because the City provided constitutionally sufficient notice
  • holding that combination of citation on plaintiff’s car and summons sent by first class mail was sufficient to satisfy due process
  • noting that the reviewing court must review all of the facts and inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party
  • holding that an officer who issued a ticket is not liable for the arrest of a plaintiff who failed to appear in court in response to the ticket because the officer had no role in issuance of the bench warrant
  • finding no Fourth Amendment seizure where government conduct consisted of an officer issuing a citation that required a court appearance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.